My money would be on Kyle, but I’m sure Murdock would give him a hard time all the same.
Thor’s referring to Hal Jordan’s visit back in Mash-Up #106 when things didn’t end so well.
There’s an article over on Newsarama (with a dreadfully misleading headling) where Ron Marz and Darryl Banks, writer and artist of GREEN LANTERN back in the 90s talk about the run they had together on the title. As a fan of that run, and of Kyle Rayner who was created by them and introduced at the start of it, I was interested to read it and a couple of things caught my eye.
From the interview:
Banks: I was already on the project with another writer then the editors decided to go in a different direction.
Marz: The previous writer had a different storyline in mind for issues #48 through #50, and Darryl actually drew some pages from that issue script.
It’s almost as though they can’t bring themselves to mention Gerard Jones by name, the writer who revitalised the Green Lantern books in the 90s . . . and who was sentenced in 2018 to prison for possession of child pornography. Don’t get me wrong – the guy’s a scumbag and deserves everything he gets, I just don’t see the point in pretending he didn’t exist.
There’s also mention of the “fridging” scene where Kyle’s girlfriend Alex is killed by Major Force and stuffed in the refrigerator. This is the original incident that sparked the “women in refrigerators” movement that rightly brought attention to the way female characters were/are often treated in fiction.
When the incident is brought up, Marz says:
Marz: Right, I knew that Kyle’s irresponsibility with the ring was going to get Alex killed. We wanted her death to be a gut punch for the audience, something unexpected and memorable. And I guess in that respect we succeeded. Certainly, in retrospect the larger context is much more apparent … Then, it was a story I was writing. I was not thinking about the larger context, both in comics and other media. Now, or course, it’s impossible to think of it without the larger context. Which I think is a good thing.
He’s right, it is a good thing that this sort of treatment of female characters should be front and centre when people are putting stories together.
Banks, however, seems to miss the point.
Nrama: What do you think of the term “fridging”?
Banks: That term wouldn’t exist except for a botched attempt at censoring the scene. If the panel was left the way I originally drew it (clearly showing Alex intact) fans may have just moved on.
Here’s the original art (which I hadn’t seen until this interview):
And here’s what was published:
Banks is wrong – “fridging” is not and never has been about how Alex appeared in the fridge, or whether she was intact or not – it’s the fact that she was created and killed with the express purpose of supplying angst and motivation to the main character.
It’s a shame that Banks, unlike Marz, doesn’t get that.
Despite that, it’s a good interview and if you, like me, remember that run with fondness overall, you’ll probably enjoy it.
Uh-oh, looks like Dejah Thoris’s quest for vengeance from #208 didn’t go so well.